JVC LX-NZ30 vs Optoma HCPro-4400
Prices updated hourly. Check retailer for current availability.
Choosing between the JVC LX-NZ30 and Optoma HCPro-4400? Both compete in the Projector segment. Here’s how they compare across the specs that matter most for your home theater.
Pricing for both models is currently unavailable. Check the retailer links below for current deals.
Looking at overall performance dimensions: The JVC LX-NZ30 scores higher in value, gaming performance, form factor, room fit. They score similarly in video quality, ease of use.
The Optoma HCPro-4400 offers higher brightness at 5000 ANSI lumens vs 3300. More lumens means a brighter image, critical if you can't fully darken your room. Below 2000 lumens needs a dedicated dark room; 3000+ handles ambient light. In a dedicated dark room, contrast ratio and color accuracy may matter more than raw brightness.
The JVC LX-NZ30 holds an advantage across more performance dimensions, but the Optoma HCPro-4400 may still be the better pick depending on which specs matter most to your setup. See the detailed comparison table below for the full breakdown.
For most home theaters, the JVC LX-NZ30 is the stronger choice — it leads in 4 of 6 scored dimensions. The Optoma HCPro-4400 makes more sense if budget is the primary constraint.
Performance Overview
Scores based on specs and category benchmarks (0–100 scale)
Detailed Specifications
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Price | N/A | N/A |
| Native Resolution | 4K | 4K |
| Technology | DLP | DLP |
| Throw Ratio Min | 1.36 | 1.2 |
| Throw Ratio Max | 2.17 | 1.92 |
| Lens Shift V | 60% | 26% |
| Lens Shift H | 23% | 10% |
| ANSI Lumens | 3300 | 5000 |
| CLO Lumens | — | — |
| Contrast Ratio | — | 3200000:1 |
| HDR Support | HDR10, HLG | HDR10+, Dolby Vision |
| Input Lag | 6.25ms | 20ms |
| Lamp Life | 20000hrs | 30000hrs |
| Light Source | laser_phosphor | laser_phosphor |
| Lens Quality | — | — |
| Tone Mapping | — | — |
| Ultra Short Throw | No | No |
| Chip Size | 0.47" | 0.65" |
| Color Depth | 12bit | 10bit |
| Zoom Ratio | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Zoom Type | Manual | Manual |
| Focus Type | Manual | Manual |
| Noise (Normal) | — | 31dB |
| Noise (Eco) | — | 25dB |
| Power Draw | 340W | 345W |
| HDMI Inputs | 2 | 3 |
| HDMI Version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| 3D Support | No | No |
| Built-in Speaker | No | Yes |
| Speaker Power | — | 10W |
| Wi-Fi | No | No |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| Streaming Apps | No | No |
| Lens Memory | No | No |
| 12V Trigger | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet | Yes | Yes |
| Frame Interpolation | No | No |
| Native Aspect | 16:9 | 16:9 |
Key Differences
- Input Lag: JVC LX-NZ30 at 6.25ms vs Optoma HCPro-4400 at 20ms. Sub-20ms is excellent for gaming. Above 40ms feels sluggish. Only matters for interactive content — film and TV don't benefit from low input lag.
- Lens Shift V: JVC LX-NZ30 at 60% vs Optoma HCPro-4400 at 26%
- Lens Shift H: JVC LX-NZ30 at 23% vs Optoma HCPro-4400 at 10%
- ANSI Lumens: JVC LX-NZ30 at 3300 vs Optoma HCPro-4400 at 5000. More lumens means a brighter image, critical if you can't fully darken your room. Below 2000 lumens needs a dedicated dark room; 3000+ handles ambient light.
- Lamp Life: JVC LX-NZ30 at 20000hrs vs Optoma HCPro-4400 at 30000hrs
Which Should You Choose?
Choose JVC LX-NZ30 if you want:
- + better input lag — sub-20ms is excellent for gaming
- + better power draw
Choose Optoma HCPro-4400 if you want:
- + better throw ratio min
- + better ansi lumens — more lumens means a brighter image, critical if you can't fully darken your room
- + better lamp life
Specifications sourced from manufacturer datasheets and verified against retailer listings. Prices updated hourly from authorized retailers. Scoring uses our open methodology — products are never ranked, promoted, or suppressed based on affiliate commission rates.
Related Comparisons
CinemaConfig may receive compensation for purchases made at participating retailers linked on this site. This compensation does not affect what products or prices are displayed, or the order of prices listed. Learn more