KEF CI200ER vs Klipsch RP-500C II-WALNUT
Prices updated hourly. Check retailer for current availability.
Choosing between the KEF CI200ER and Klipsch RP-500C II-WALNUT? Both compete in the Speaker (L/R) segment. Here’s how they compare across the specs that matter most for your home theater.
Pricing for both models is currently unavailable. Check the retailer links below for current deals.
Looking at overall performance dimensions: The KEF CI200ER scores higher in form factor, room fit. The Klipsch RP-500C II-WALNUT leads in value, audio quality, volume/SPL.
For speaker performance, the Klipsch RP-500C II-WALNUT is more sensitive at 94 dB vs 90 dB. Higher sensitivity means your receiver works less hard, leaving more headroom for dynamic peaks in movie soundtracks. A speaker rated 3 dB higher in sensitivity needs half the amplifier power to reach the same volume.
These two Speaker (L/R) options trade wins across different dimensions. The right choice depends on which specs matter most for your room and listening preferences — review the detailed table below to decide.
For most home theaters, the Klipsch RP-500C II-WALNUT is the stronger choice — it leads in 3 of 5 scored dimensions. The KEF CI200ER makes more sense if you prioritize the 2 dimensions where it leads.
Performance Overview
Scores based on specs and category benchmarks (0–100 scale)
KEF CI200ER
Klipsch RP-500C II-WALNUT
Detailed Specifications
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Price | N/A | N/A |
| Driver Config | 2-way | 2-way |
| Sensitivity | 90dB | 94dB |
| Impedance | 8Ω | 8Ω |
| Freq Response Low | 45Hz | 56Hz |
| Freq Response High | 20000Hz | 25000Hz |
| Crossover | 2800Hz | 1630Hz |
| Bi-Amp Capable | No | No |
| Rec. Power Min | 10W | 10W |
| Rec. Power Max | 125W | — |
| Mounting Type | in-wall | center |
| Mounting Depth | 3.83" | — |
| Cutout Diameter | — | — |
| Cutout Width | — | — |
| Cutout Height | — | — |
| Wall Thickness Min | 0.24" | — |
| Wall Thickness Max | 1.46" | — |
| Back Box Included | No | No |
| Back Box Required | No | No |
| Mounting Mechanism | — | — |
| Installation Type | — | — |
| Stud Spacing | — | — |
| Paintable Grille | No | No |
| Magnetic Grille | No | No |
| Grille Shape | — | — |
| Connector Type | — | — |
| Wire Gauge Max | — | — |
| Angle Adjustable | No | No |
| Pivot Angle | — | — |
| Treble Attenuation Switch | No | No |
| LCR Capable | No | No |
| Coaxial | No | No |
| IP Rating | — | — |
| Moisture Resistant | No | No |
| UV Resistant | No | No |
| Salt Spray Rated | No | No |
| Enclosure Material | — | — |
| Grille Material | — | — |
| Bracket Type | — | — |
| Bracket Included | No | No |
| Dual Voice Coil (SDI) | No | No |
Key Differences
- Crossover: KEF CI200ER at 2800Hz vs Klipsch RP-500C II-WALNUT at 1630Hz
- Freq Response High: KEF CI200ER at 20000Hz vs Klipsch RP-500C II-WALNUT at 25000Hz
- Freq Response Low: KEF CI200ER at 45Hz vs Klipsch RP-500C II-WALNUT at 56Hz. Determines how much bass a speaker handles on its own versus relying on a subwoofer for low-end support.
- Sensitivity: KEF CI200ER at 90dB vs Klipsch RP-500C II-WALNUT at 94dB. Higher sensitivity means your receiver works less hard, leaving more headroom for dynamic peaks in movie soundtracks. A speaker rated 3 dB higher in sensitivity needs half the amplifier power to reach the same volume.
- Rec. Power Max: KEF CI200ER at 125W vs Klipsch RP-500C II-WALNUT at —
Which Should You Choose?
Choose KEF CI200ER if you want:
- + better freq response low — determines how much bass a speaker handles on its own versus relying on a subwoofer for low-end support
Choose Klipsch RP-500C II-WALNUT if you want:
- + better sensitivity — higher sensitivity means your receiver works less hard, leaving more headroom for dynamic peaks in movie soundtracks
See Where These Rank
Check our editorial rankings to see how KEF CI200ER and Klipsch RP-500C II-WALNUT compare to the rest of the field.
Best Speaker (L/R) RankingsRelated Calculators
Specifications sourced from manufacturer datasheets and verified against retailer listings. Prices updated hourly from authorized retailers. Scoring uses our open methodology — products are never ranked, promoted, or suppressed based on affiliate commission rates.
Related Comparisons
KEF CI200ER
vs Focal KANTA CENTER-HIGH-GLOSS-WALNUT-IVORY
Klipsch RP-500C II-WALNUT
vs Focal KANTA CENTER-HIGH-GLOSS-WALNUT-IVORY
KEF CI200ER
vs Focal Aria Evo X No.2-BLACK HIGH GLOSS
Klipsch RP-500C II-WALNUT
vs Focal Aria Evo X No.2-BLACK HIGH GLOSS
KEF CI200ER
vs Bowers & Wilkins 603 S3-OAK
Klipsch RP-500C II-WALNUT
vs Bowers & Wilkins 603 S3-OAK
CinemaConfig may receive compensation for purchases made at participating retailers linked on this site. This compensation does not affect what products or prices are displayed, or the order of prices listed. See our affiliate disclosure.