ELAC ELEGANT vs KEF CI130QRFL
Prices updated hourly. Check retailer for current availability.
Choosing between the ELAC ELEGANT and KEF CI130QRFL? Both compete in the Speaker (L/R) segment. Here’s how they compare across the specs that matter most for your home theater.
Pricing for both models is currently unavailable. Check the retailer links below for current deals.
Looking at overall performance dimensions: The ELAC ELEGANT scores higher in value, audio quality, volume/SPL. The KEF CI130QRFL leads in form factor, room fit.
For speaker performance, impedances of 4Ω vs 8Ω. Lower impedance draws more current from your receiver. A 4-ohm speaker needs a receiver rated for that load, or you risk thermal shutdown during loud passages.
These two Speaker (L/R) options trade wins across different dimensions. The right choice depends on which specs matter most for your room and listening preferences — review the detailed table below to decide.
For most home theaters, the ELAC ELEGANT is the stronger choice — it leads in 3 of 5 scored dimensions. The KEF CI130QRFL makes more sense if you prioritize the 2 dimensions where it leads.
Performance Overview
Scores based on specs and category benchmarks (0–100 scale)
ELAC ELEGANT
KEF CI130QRFL
Detailed Specifications
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Price | N/A | N/A |
| Driver Config | 2-way bass reflex | 2-way |
| Sensitivity | 87dB | 87dB |
| Impedance | 4Ω | 8Ω |
| Freq Response Low | 42Hz | 45Hz |
| Freq Response High | 50000Hz | 34000Hz |
| Crossover | 3200Hz | 3800Hz |
| Bi-Amp Capable | No | No |
| Rec. Power Min | 150W | 10W |
| Rec. Power Max | — | 100W |
| Mounting Type | bookshelf | in-wall |
| Mounting Depth | — | 3.98" |
| Cutout Diameter | — | — |
| Cutout Width | — | — |
| Cutout Height | — | — |
| Wall Thickness Min | — | 0.28" |
| Wall Thickness Max | — | 1.22" |
| Back Box Included | No | No |
| Back Box Required | No | No |
| Mounting Mechanism | — | — |
| Installation Type | — | — |
| Stud Spacing | — | — |
| Paintable Grille | No | No |
| Magnetic Grille | No | No |
| Grille Shape | — | — |
| Connector Type | — | — |
| Wire Gauge Max | — | — |
| Angle Adjustable | No | No |
| Pivot Angle | — | — |
| Treble Attenuation Switch | No | No |
| LCR Capable | No | No |
| Coaxial | No | Yes |
| IP Rating | — | — |
| Moisture Resistant | No | No |
| UV Resistant | No | No |
| Salt Spray Rated | No | No |
| Enclosure Material | — | — |
| Grille Material | — | — |
| Bracket Type | — | — |
| Bracket Included | No | No |
| Dual Voice Coil (SDI) | No | No |
Key Differences
- Rec. Power Min: ELAC ELEGANT at 150W vs KEF CI130QRFL at 10W
- Impedance: ELAC ELEGANT at 4Ω vs KEF CI130QRFL at 8Ω. Lower impedance draws more current from your receiver. A 4-ohm speaker needs a receiver rated for that load, or you risk thermal shutdown during loud passages.
- Freq Response High: ELAC ELEGANT at 50000Hz vs KEF CI130QRFL at 34000Hz
- Crossover: ELAC ELEGANT at 3200Hz vs KEF CI130QRFL at 3800Hz
- Freq Response Low: ELAC ELEGANT at 42Hz vs KEF CI130QRFL at 45Hz. Determines how much bass a speaker handles on its own versus relying on a subwoofer for low-end support.
Which Should You Choose?
Choose ELAC ELEGANT if you want:
- + better freq response low — determines how much bass a speaker handles on its own versus relying on a subwoofer for low-end support
See Where These Rank
Check our editorial rankings to see how ELAC ELEGANT and KEF CI130QRFL compare to the rest of the field.
Best Speaker (L/R) RankingsRelated Calculators
Specifications sourced from manufacturer datasheets and verified against retailer listings. Prices updated hourly from authorized retailers. Scoring uses our open methodology — products are never ranked, promoted, or suppressed based on affiliate commission rates.
CinemaConfig may receive compensation for purchases made at participating retailers linked on this site. This compensation does not affect what products or prices are displayed, or the order of prices listed. See our affiliate disclosure.

