Coastal Source 216CT110BN vs Revel 265C563
Prices updated hourly. Check retailer for current availability.
Choosing between the Coastal Source 216CT110BN and Revel 265C563? Both compete in the Speaker (L/R) segment. Here’s how they compare across the specs that matter most for your home theater.
Pricing for both models is currently unavailable. Check the retailer links below for current deals.
Looking at overall performance dimensions: The Revel 265C563 leads in value, audio quality, volume/SPL, form factor, room fit.
For speaker performance, impedances of 16Ω vs 8Ω. Lower impedance draws more current from your receiver. A 4-ohm speaker needs a receiver rated for that load, or you risk thermal shutdown during loud passages.
The Revel 265C563 holds an advantage across more performance dimensions, but the Coastal Source 216CT110BN may still be the better pick depending on which specs matter most to your setup. See the detailed comparison table below for the full breakdown.
For most home theaters, the Revel 265C563 is the stronger choice — it leads in 5 of 5 scored dimensions. The Coastal Source 216CT110BN makes more sense if budget is the primary constraint.
Performance Overview
Scores based on specs and category benchmarks (0–100 scale)
Coastal Source 216CT110BN
Revel 265C563
Detailed Specifications
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Price | N/A | N/A |
| Driver Config | 2-way | 2-way |
| Sensitivity | 88dB | 88dB |
| Impedance | 16Ω | 8Ω |
| Freq Response Low | 70Hz | 50Hz |
| Freq Response High | 20000Hz | 18000Hz |
| Crossover | — | — |
| Bi-Amp Capable | No | No |
| Rec. Power Min | 25W | 10W |
| Rec. Power Max | 75W | 130W |
| Mounting Type | outdoor | in-ceiling |
| Mounting Depth | — | 4.9" |
| Cutout Diameter | — | 8" |
| Cutout Width | — | — |
| Cutout Height | — | — |
| Wall Thickness Min | — | 0.5" |
| Wall Thickness Max | — | 2" |
| Back Box Included | No | No |
| Back Box Required | No | No |
| Mounting Mechanism | — | — |
| Installation Type | — | — |
| Stud Spacing | — | — |
| Paintable Grille | No | Yes |
| Magnetic Grille | No | Yes |
| Grille Shape | — | — |
| Connector Type | — | — |
| Wire Gauge Max | — | — |
| Angle Adjustable | No | No |
| Pivot Angle | — | — |
| Treble Attenuation Switch | No | No |
| LCR Capable | No | No |
| Coaxial | No | No |
| IP Rating | — | — |
| Moisture Resistant | Yes | No |
| UV Resistant | Yes | No |
| Salt Spray Rated | No | No |
| Enclosure Material | — | — |
| Grille Material | — | — |
| Bracket Type | — | — |
| Bracket Included | No | No |
| Dual Voice Coil (SDI) | No | No |
Key Differences
- Rec. Power Min: Coastal Source 216CT110BN at 25W vs Revel 265C563 at 10W
- Impedance: Coastal Source 216CT110BN at 16Ω vs Revel 265C563 at 8Ω. Lower impedance draws more current from your receiver. A 4-ohm speaker needs a receiver rated for that load, or you risk thermal shutdown during loud passages.
- Rec. Power Max: Coastal Source 216CT110BN at 75W vs Revel 265C563 at 130W
- Freq Response Low: Coastal Source 216CT110BN at 70Hz vs Revel 265C563 at 50Hz. Determines how much bass a speaker handles on its own versus relying on a subwoofer for low-end support.
- Freq Response High: Coastal Source 216CT110BN at 20000Hz vs Revel 265C563 at 18000Hz
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Revel 265C563 if you want:
- + better freq response low — determines how much bass a speaker handles on its own versus relying on a subwoofer for low-end support
See Where These Rank
Check our editorial rankings to see how Coastal Source 216CT110BN and Revel 265C563 compare to the rest of the field.
Best Speaker (L/R) RankingsRelated Calculators
Specifications sourced from manufacturer datasheets and verified against retailer listings. Prices updated hourly from authorized retailers. Scoring uses our open methodology — products are never ranked, promoted, or suppressed based on affiliate commission rates.
CinemaConfig may receive compensation for purchases made at participating retailers linked on this site. This compensation does not affect what products or prices are displayed, or the order of prices listed. See our affiliate disclosure.

