BenQ EW800ST vs Optoma PHOTON-LIFE-PK32
Prices updated hourly. Check retailer for current availability.
Choosing between the BenQ EW800ST and Optoma PHOTON-LIFE-PK32? Both compete in the Projector segment. Here’s how they compare across the specs that matter most for your home theater.
Pricing for both models is currently unavailable. Check the retailer links below for current deals.
Looking at overall performance dimensions: The BenQ EW800ST scores higher in value, video quality. The Optoma PHOTON-LIFE-PK32 leads in gaming performance, form factor, room fit. They score similarly in ease of use.
The BenQ EW800ST offers higher brightness at 3300 ANSI lumens vs 1100. More lumens means a brighter image, critical if you can't fully darken your room. Below 2000 lumens needs a dedicated dark room; 3000+ handles ambient light. In a dedicated dark room, contrast ratio and color accuracy may matter more than raw brightness.
These two Projector options trade wins across different dimensions. The right choice depends on which specs matter most for your room and listening preferences — review the detailed table below to decide.
For most home theaters, the Optoma PHOTON-LIFE-PK32 is the stronger choice — it leads in 3 of 6 scored dimensions. The BenQ EW800ST makes more sense if you prioritize the 2 dimensions where it leads.
Performance Overview
Scores based on specs and category benchmarks (0–100 scale)
BenQ EW800ST
Optoma PHOTON-LIFE-PK32
Detailed Specifications
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Price | N/A | N/A |
| Native Resolution | WXGA | 4K |
| Technology | DLP | DLP |
| Throw Ratio Min | 0.49 | 1.1 |
| Throw Ratio Max | 0.49 | 1.43 |
| Lens Shift V | — | 5% |
| Lens Shift H | — | — |
| ANSI Lumens | 3300 | 1100 |
| CLO Lumens | — | — |
| Contrast Ratio | 20000:1 | 250000:1 |
| HDR Support | HDR10 | |
| Input Lag | 33.4ms | — |
| Lamp Life | 15000hrs | — |
| Light Source | lamp | LED |
| Lens Quality | — | — |
| Tone Mapping | — | — |
| Ultra Short Throw | Yes | No |
| Chip Size | — | — |
| Color Depth | 30bit | — |
| Zoom Ratio | 1 | 1.3 |
| Zoom Type | fixed | manual |
| Focus Type | — | — |
| Noise (Normal) | 33dB | 31dB |
| Noise (Eco) | 29dB | 27dB |
| Power Draw | — | — |
| HDMI Inputs | 1 | 2 |
| HDMI Version | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 3D Support | Yes | No |
| Built-in Speaker | Yes | No |
| Speaker Power | 2W | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| Streaming Apps | Yes | No |
| Lens Memory | No | No |
| 12V Trigger | No | No |
| Ethernet | Yes | No |
| Frame Interpolation | No | No |
| Native Aspect | — | 16:9 |
Key Differences
- Contrast Ratio: BenQ EW800ST at 20000:1 vs Optoma PHOTON-LIFE-PK32 at 250000:1
- Native Resolution: BenQ EW800ST at WXGA vs Optoma PHOTON-LIFE-PK32 at 4K
- ANSI Lumens: BenQ EW800ST at 3300 vs Optoma PHOTON-LIFE-PK32 at 1100. More lumens means a brighter image, critical if you can't fully darken your room. Below 2000 lumens needs a dedicated dark room; 3000+ handles ambient light.
- Throw Ratio Max: BenQ EW800ST at 0.49 vs Optoma PHOTON-LIFE-PK32 at 1.43
- Throw Ratio Min: BenQ EW800ST at 0.49 vs Optoma PHOTON-LIFE-PK32 at 1.1
Which Should You Choose?
Choose BenQ EW800ST if you want:
- + better throw ratio min
- + better ansi lumens — more lumens means a brighter image, critical if you can't fully darken your room
Choose Optoma PHOTON-LIFE-PK32 if you want:
- + better contrast ratio
- + better noise (normal)
- + better noise (eco)
See Where These Rank
Check our editorial rankings to see how BenQ EW800ST and Optoma PHOTON-LIFE-PK32 compare to the rest of the field.
Best Projector RankingsRelated Calculators
Specifications sourced from manufacturer datasheets and verified against retailer listings. Prices updated hourly from authorized retailers. Scoring uses our open methodology — products are never ranked, promoted, or suppressed based on affiliate commission rates.
CinemaConfig may receive compensation for purchases made at participating retailers linked on this site. This compensation does not affect what products or prices are displayed, or the order of prices listed. See our affiliate disclosure.

